Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (9) TMI 679

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h, SDR For the Respondent JUDGEMENT The instant applications filed by M/s. Advance Detergents Ltd., Pondicherry seek to waive predeposit and stay of recovery of (i) Rs. 4,86,936/- being the duty demanded and penalty of Rs. 25,000/- pertaining to the period April 2004 to Feb2005 (appeal No. E/108/2007) and (ii) Rs. 2,47,017/- being the duty demanded and penalty of Rs. 25,000/- pertaining to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order. Ld. Counsel produced the said postal receipt. He prays that the matter may be remanded to the lower authority for verification as to whether the appeal had been received in time in his office. Ld. SDR submits that the appellants unit is located in Pondicherry and the appellants did not have to send the appeal from Delhi. Moreover, earlier, the appellants used to file appeals in person. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pugned order shows that the lower authority did not consider the appellants submissions regarding timely dispatch of the appeal. It was in any case not proper that the Commissioner (Appeals) did not discuss the explanation furnished by the appellants for the delay while rejecting their appeal on the ground of limitation. I consider it necessary that the lower authority causes verification of the ....