Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (1) TMI 908

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lowance u/s 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961 and in the appeal of the assessee, following additional ground was raised as under which stood remitted on 10.12.2009: "That on facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant should have been held entitled to set off of carried forward business losses against the assessed income for the year under consideration." 2. Facts indicate that the appeal was filed against order dated 28.12.2006 passed u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961. There was only one issue in this case i.e. against disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 97,87,517/- by invoking the provisions of section 14A of the I.T. Act. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had invested Rs. 17,36,89,230/- in purchase of share....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ital gain. (iii) That the appellant had earned dividend income in assessment year 2002- 03 which was claimed as exempt. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer disallowed the interest and other administrative expenses by applying the provision of section 14A against which the appeal is pending before the ITAT. In the light of these facts, learned AR argued that the disallowance u/s 14A in this year is not justified and the same is liable to be deleted. (iv) That the appellant had earned interest income to the extent of Rs. 100.78 lakhs against the loan and advances while the interest was paid to the extent of Rs. 121.03 lakhs. Thus, the net interest expenditure was debited to the expenditure of Rsd.20.25 lakhs. Accordingly, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ored back on the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to follow the decision of Maxopp Investment Ltd., cited supra to decide the issue afresh. 6. Ld.DR could not controvert this factual aspect of the matter and rather submitted that the matter can be restored back on the file of the Assessing Officer for reconsideration of the issue afresh. 7. After having heard both the sides and considering the material on record, we find that issue in relation to disallowance under section 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961, the jurisdictional High Court in the case of Maxopp Investment Ltd.(supra) has observed as under: "Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Expenditure incurred in ....