2017 (3) TMI 345

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Applicants Shri Govind Dixit, DR for the Respondent Per V. Padmanabhan The present appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 7/2015 dated 12.01.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) IGI Airport, New Delhi. The dispute pertains to refund claims filed by the appellant under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14.09.2007 in respect of additional duty of Customs paid u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o refund claims in the same month. She further submitted that the restrictive conditions in the CBEC circular cannot take away the substantive benefit granted by the said notification. 4. Ld. DR reiterated the findings of the authorities below. 5. Notification No. 102/2007- Cus, dated 14.9.2007 provides for refund of Additional duty of Customs in lieu of VAT, which is commonly referred to as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ear. From the wordings of the Circular, it is clear that the same has been issued for the convenience of processing of the refund claims on regular periodicity. The Circular, however, does not specify any condition to say that a second refund claim filed in a month would be barred. In any case, it is well settled that the substantial benefit granted by law cannot be taken away by a circular. 6.....