Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 293

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Superintendent (AR), for Respondent Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present Appeal is filed by the appellant, M/s R R Heavy Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. against Order-in-Appeal No. 257-CE/MRT-II/2007 dated 11/12/2007 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Meerut-II. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants were manufacturers of Sugar Plant & Mach....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dicated through Order-in-Original No. 66/2006 dated 28/11/2006. The Original Authority confirmed the demand and imposed equal penalty. Aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original appellant preferred appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was decided through impugned Order-in-Appeal No. 257-CE/MRT-II/2007 dated 11/12/2007, wherein the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) did not interfere with the said....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or otherwise of erection & commissioning charges in the assessable value of goods for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty. We also find that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above stated case's Para 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 as held as follows:- "2. The Department wanted to add certain cost incurred towards installation, erection, etc., for arriving at the transaction value. This was so done by the Commi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (88) E.L.T. 622 (S.C.)], holding that inclusion of installation, erection and commissioning charges for equipment installed at customer's premises cannot be added/included to determine the assessable value. 5. This is obvious conclusion on reading of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act as per which the transaction value is to be arrived at the time of clearance of the goods at the factory gate. ....