Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (2) TMI 1073

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n-up for disposal. Heard Ld AR for the Revenue. 2. This appeal is filed against OTA OIA-51/2011/COMMR-A-/CMC/RAJ dt 09/03/2011 Passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Customs and Service RAJKOT. 3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are, that the appellant load availed CENVAT Credit amounting to Rs. 22,27,974/- on Capital Goods at their new factory premises and Input Service Tax Credit of Rs. 7,56,612/- on installation/maintenance of Wind Mills. located outside the factory premises. A demand notice was issued to them for recovery of, the said credit alongwith interest with proposal for peanlty. On adjudication, the demand was confirmed with equal amount of penalty. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed an ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the premises. Shifting of a premises involves shifting of inputs input in process, plant and machinery and capital goods also, but in the instant case capital goods are not shifted to the new premises and the Cenvat credit involved on the capital goods lying in old premises have been taken that the new premises. I further observe that the appellant subsequently surrendered the registration for the old premises and have obtained fresh registration for the new premises. I find that appellant have relied upon the decision of Hon'ble CEGAT, New Delhi in the case of M/s. J. K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. reported at 2002 (147) E.L.T. 996 (Tri.-Del). I find that the case relied upon by the appellant is not squarely applicable to the instant case as th....