Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (2) TMI 1045

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ara, Authorised Representative ORDER Per Dr. D. M. Misra This is an appeal filed against OIA No. COMMR-A-/291/VDR-II/2009 dated 30/11/2009 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise and Customs- Vadodara. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant during the relevant period i.e. March, 2007 received Banking & Financial Services from the overseas service provider....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....imposition of penalty, but, the benefit to discharge 25% of the penalty imposed is extended subject to fulfilment of the conditions laid down under the said provision. Hence, the present appeal. 3. The Ld. Advocate Shri Dhaval Shah for the appellant has submitted that under a bonafide belief even though they have paid the value of the services received from the Oversees Service Provider in March ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... STR 312 (Tri.-Mumbai)]. 4. Per contra, the Ld. AR Shri Sameer Chitkara for the Revenue vehemently argued that there is no material on record by which the appellant could establish that they had a bonafide belief in not discharging the service tax required to be paid by them as recipient of service under Rule 2 (1) (d) (iv) of Service Tax Rules, 1994. In support of his contention, he referred to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e by the appellant on receipt of Banking & Financial Services from the overseas service provider has been discharged alongwith interest within six to seven months from the remittance made. No doubt the said amount was paid after correspondences with the Revenue, but, it cannot be said that the default in payment was not with an intention to suppress material facts with intent to evade payment of s....