2017 (2) TMI 971

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Per : Devender Singh The Revenue is in appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 99/SVS/GGN/2014 dated 28.02.2014 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Delhi-III, Gurgaon. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent M/s Saurer Embroidery System (India) Ltd. were registered with Central Excise for manufacture of embroidery falling under chapter 5805.19 which attracted....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....im amount of Rs. 31,18,085/-, sanctioned amount was Rs. 3,01,820/-) originally filed by the respondent under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the ground that the refund claim did not satisfy the conditions of Section 11B ibid. The respondent preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Delhi-III, Gurgoan against the referred Refund Order for the amount of claim....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e O-I-O No. R-164/CE/2010-11 dated 15.11.2010 was passed in compliance of O-I-A No. 325/BK/GGN/2010 dated 16.08.2010 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the department has preferred appeal before CESTAT against the O-I-A. (ii) Since the earlier appeal of the department is pending with CESTAT in the subject case the Commissioner (Appeals) should have followed the judicial discipline in comp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the allowing of the appeal on 28^th June, 1984. Therefore, we are unable to uphold the contention of the Counsel appearing for the respondents. Till a stay order obtained by the respondents, mere filing of the appeal before the Tribunal did not result in granting an automatic stay order in favour of the respondents. If the respondents so desired, they should have prayed for the stay of the order ....