Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (2) TMI 895

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....esh Agarwal, DR) Respondent Per Mr. (Dr.) Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed by the assessee-Appellants against the order-in-appeal no. 293/09 dated 09.12.2009 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) Customs & Central Excise, Indore. The period in dispute is September, 2006 to December, 2006. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee-Appellants are the manufacturer of "S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and on perusal of the record, it appears that the supply of the goods to the sister concern for captive consumption is subject to Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 which reads as under : "Where the excisable goods are not sold by the assessee but are used for consumption by him or on his behalf in the production or manufacture of other articles, the value shall be one hundred and ten percent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... When the goods have been cleared by the assessee-Appellants to be supplied free of cost with other products manufactured by their sister concern, then the valuation of the item in question will have to be made under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000. Thus, on merit, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order whereby the exc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CCE&ST, Vapi vs Charak Pharma P. Ltd., 2012 (278) ELT 319 (Guj.); (vi) CCE&C, Surat-II vs MTZ Polyfilms Ltd., 2010 (256) ELT 539 (Guj); (vii) CCE vs Shree Ram Steel Rolling Mills, 2008 (221) ELT 333 (Bom) 7. After hearing the rival submissions, it appears that the assessee-Appellants have suppressed the material facts from the Department by not disclosing in their monthly ER-1 Return that....