Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1967 (1) TMI 8

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he two questions referred are : " 1. Whether, in the circumstances of the case, the application of the flat rate of 5% was justified when in the case of another dealer of the same place, namely, M/s. Abid Hussain Sajjad Hussain of Mubarakpur, who is also an assessee, a rate of 2% disclosed was accepted ? 2. Whether, in any case, the income-tax authorities were not liable to split up the total e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer estimated the sales at Rs. 2,50,000 on which a flat rate of 5% was applied. In applying this rate the Income-tax Officer took into consideration the fact that the assessee did some business also on his own account. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed the assessment. He observed that there was no check either on purchases or on sales and, therefore, it could not be sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....him. The Tribunal did not consider that any interference with the rate of 501, was called for. It was mentioned that most of the sales were " invoice sales ", which means outstation sales, and the inference was that such sales usually carry a larger margin of profit than local sales. No attempt also appears to have been made at any time before the Tribunal to split up the turnover of the business ....