2015 (7) TMI 1192

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. Sukriti Das, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER Brief facts of the case are that the respondent is engaged in the manufacture of aerated water and Beverages syrup falling under Chapters 21 and 22 respectively of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Respondent avails Cenvat credit of Central Excise duty paid on the inputs and capital goods used in or in relation to manufacture of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... confirmed and equal amount of penalty was imposed on the Respondent. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the adjudged demand and allowed the appeal in favour of the Respondent herein. Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order dated 25-11-2013, the Revenue appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal. 2. Heard the ld. Counsel for both the sides and perused the records. 3.....