TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (7) TMI 1305
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lesh Tiwari and R.C.S. Bhadoria, for the Respondent. ORDER For the purported exports made by the petitioners, they availed duty drawbacks. Thereafter, a show cause notice was issued by the respondent alleging that the Government was defrauded and the aforesaid duty drawback was wrongfully availed by the petitioner. After that, the petitioners filed reply as well as written statement in response ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n of the petitioner has been dismissed by the learned CESTAT vide orders dated 17-6-2009 and the petitioners are directed to deposit the amount of ₹ 1,00,05,250/- and ₹ 67,56,033/- within four weeks. This is the order under challenge in the present proceedings. 2. The argument of learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners is that while passing the impugned order the Tri....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d any substantial evidence to lay before us to come to the rescue of the appellant. The appellant failed to discard or delink the chain of evidence. Therefore, prima facie we are of the view that interest of revenue shall be prejudiced if pre-deposit is dispensed with. This we say upon thorough examination of materials before us and also following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Bena....