2017 (2) TMI 509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x at source at a lesser rate on the entire payment, i.e., over and above the sum specified in the certificate u/s.197 of the Act. The details of such payment are as follows:   Amount of interest Specified in the certificate u/s.197 Amount of interest paid by the Assessee M/S.MKJ Enterprises Ltd. Rs.5,85,493 Rs. 6,26,559 M/S.Amrit Sales Promotion Pvt. Ltd. Rs.44,44,14,448 Rs.5,47,02,126   3. The AO was of the view that the deduction of tax at the rate specified in the certificate u/s.197 of the Act was valid only in respect of the amount specified in the certificate and in respect of the remaining sum, the Assessee ought to have deducted tax at source at the normal applicable rate. To the extent the Assessee failed to do, the AO held that there was short deduction of tax at source and he levied interest u/s.201(1A) of the Act in respect of such short deduction of tax at source, as per the following details: Deductee Payment made Specified as per 197(1) Excess amount paid Short deduction Date of payment Month of default Interest Amrit Sales Promotion P.L. 626559 585493 41066 8036 @ 19.57%) 31/03/2008 6 482 MKJ Ent.Ltd. 54792126 44....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....20 1(1) of the Act. * That the Ld. A.O. on erroneous interpretation took the estimated figure shown in the Annexure as gross payment of interest during the year and hence treatment of such an estimated figure as representing actual amount of interest liable for deduction of tax at normal rate was erroneous and reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. (supra) was thus misplaced. * That the deductees had paid excess advance tax and/or had excess TDS credit and hence they claimed refund of tax. Hence interest could not be levied in such circumstances u/s.201(lA). Several case laws were relied upon in support of the above settled position in law. 9. The Ld. C.I.T.(A), however, found the explanation of the assessee not acceptable as, according to him, the Ld. A.O. has rightly considered the applicability of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Hindustan Coco Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. [293 ITR 226 (SC)] to hold that the amount to be deducted was specifically mentioned in the Annexure and hence the assessee-deduction was liable to pay interest u/s.201(lA). He further held relying on CBDT Circ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ified in certificate u/s 197(1) of the Act. Our attention was also drawn to the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. 351 ITR 138 (P&H). In the aforesaid case there were two units of the person deducting tax at source at Mumbai and Bahadurgarh. Certificate u/s 197 was issued in the name of Mumbai unit for short deduction of tax. The person making payment namely Bahadurgarh unit also deducted tax at source at a lesser rate. Proceedings were initiated for short deduction of tax against the Bahadurgarh Unit. The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court held that there was no short deduction of tax at source and the certificate u/s 197 of the Act was valid for both the units of the person making payment. Our attention was also drawn to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GE India Technology Centre P.Ltd. vs CIT 327 ITR 456 (SC) wherein it was held that in case where the AO himself had inferred a lower rate, there is no justification whatsoever for the AO to infer short deduction in respect of similar payments not covered by the certificate. 11. The ld. DR reiterated the stand of the revenue as reflected i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....last three years; whichever is higher. (2) The certificate shall be valid for the assessment year to be specified in the certificate, unless it is cancelled by him at any time before the expiry of the specified period. An application for a fresh certificate may be made, if required, after the expiry of the period of validity of the earlier certificate. (3) The certificate shall be valid only for the person named therein. (4) The certificate shall be issued direct to the person responsible for paying the income under advice to the applicant. 13. Section 201(1) & (1A) of the Act reads thus: "Consequences of failure to deduct or pay. 201. (1) Where any person, including the principal officer of a company,- (a) who is required to deduct any sum in accordance with the provisions of this Act; or (b) referred to in sub-section (1A) of section 192, being an employer, does not deduct, or does not pay, or after so deducting fails to pay, the whole or any part of the tax, as required by or under this Act, then, such person, shall, without prejudice to any other consequences which he may incur, be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax: Provided that a....