TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (2) TMI 425
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mption Notification No. 4/97-CE and subsequent notification, according to which the value of chassis is not included in the assessable value for charging the duty. The appellant received the chassis along with running gear. The contention of the department is that only the value of chassis is excluded from total value of the motor vehicle and not the value of the running gear. Therefore the demand was raised on the value of running gear. Being aggrieved by the Order-in-Original the appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who rejected the appeals of the appellant, therefore the appellant are before us. 2. Shri Mayur Shroff, Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that they received chassis of motor vehicle along with....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sion of the Tribunal in the case of Fabtech Engineers (supra) has been considered and accordingly held that the value of running gear should not be included in the assessable value of the motor vehicle, in terms of Notification No. 4/97-CE. The relevant para is reproduced below:- "The appellant company is a body builder, who fabricate the LPG tanks and fix the same on the chassis received from their customers and the resultant goods are that semi-trailers. There is no dispute that semi-trailers are not mechanically propelled vehicles and would be eligible for duty exemption under Notification No. 4/77-C.E., even though the appellant had classified the same under Heading 87.04 and were paying duty on that basis. However, dispute in this ca....