2016 (1) TMI 1244

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Alwar dated 09.07.2014 wherein the assessee has taken the following ground of appeal : "That the ld. Assessing Officer has erred in law as well as on the facts and circumstances of the case in imposing penalty of Rs. 33,660/- u/s 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 and the ld. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the same." 2. The relev....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the CIT(A) in restricting the disallowance of Rs. 1,00,000/- as against Rs. 2,00,000/- disallowed by the AO. The AO thereafter imposed penalty of Rs. 33,600/- on the said disallowance of Rs. 1,00,000/-. 2.1 Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal against the said levy of penalty before the ld. CIT(A) who has confirmed the said levy of penalty and hence the matter is before u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Coordinate Bench of ITAT. The said disallowance is out of the total expenses of Rs. 18,57,263/- which basically means 95% of the expenses have been held to have incurred for the purpose of business and only 5% have been held for non-business purposes. The ld. AO has not given any finding regarding specific expenditure/ transactions which has resulted in the said disallowance. He has merely done....