2015 (2) TMI 1215

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. None for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T)]. - Proceedings were initiated on the ground that appellants were not maintaining separate accounts in respect of common inputs used in the manufacture of exempted and dutiable products and therefore, in accordance with provisions of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the appellant was required to pay a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....preciation : "8. I do not see any merit and substance in the adjudicating authority's above findings. I can see that the statement dated 14-8-2006 of the appellants' Manager has been mis-read by the adjudicating authority. In fact the appellants have been maintaining separate BIN cards from October 2005 (after knowing of the exemption) for the inputs required for exempted goods which conta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and allow the subject appeal, with all its consequential relief, if any, as per law." 4. As regards the submission that the accounts should have been maintained and segregation should have been done at the time of receipt itself, we find that this would not have been possible under the circumstances and there are several decisions taking a view that even subsequent reversal of credit woul....