Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (2) TMI 385

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent. [Order Per: Madhu Mohan Damodhar] Issue in dispute relates to the eligibility or otherwise of CENVAT Credit on angles, channels and beams etc., used to erect the towers and pre-fabricated buildings on which transmission equipments were installed. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of the appellant, Ld. Advocate Sh. R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rtaining to towers on the ground that the towers are not directly used for providing output service but are only used as structural support and therefore do not qualify as capital goods. Further the respondent also has denied the credit pertaining to towers on the ground that the towers are immovable and hence not goods. Credit also denied on the pre-fabricated buildings and towers on the premise ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bay in the following cases: (i) Bharti Airtel Ltd., Vs CCE, Pune-III [2014 (35) STR 865 (Bomb)] (ii) Vodafone India Ltd., Vs CCE, Mumbai-II [2015-TlOL-2098-HC-MUM-ST] We also find that the Larger Bench in M/s Tower Vision India Private Ltd., vs CCE (Adj), Delhi [2016 (42) STR 249 (Tri-LB)] following the above judgments had also held in favour of Revenue. 5. In these circumstances we ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....afone Essar Digilink India Ltd., Vs Commr of CET Panchkula [2016-TIOL-873-CESTAT-CHD], we hold that the penalties imposed on the appellant on these cases will have to be set aside. For the same reason, the demand which is barred by limitation (September, 2007) for an amount of Rs. 35,20,725/- will require to be set aside, which we hereby do. However, demand of Rs. 2,51,47,455/- for the normal peri....