Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (2) TMI 24

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ether the service, claimed to have been exported, is taxable or not; (b) Appellant had failed to establish the exact nature of service; (c) Service so exported does not qualify as service under he Export of Services Rules, 2005; (d) Condition "used in providing output services in the material period" of Notification No. 5/2006 dated 14.3.2006 has not been met with; (e) Use of input service in the export of service is not established; (f) There was no co-relation between FIRCs and the export invoice; (g) Relevant original documents were not submitted. 3. The original authority vide his order dated 26.2.2010 rejected the refund claim filed by the appellant. When the issue was agitated before the Commissioner (Appeals), he upheld the im....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....plicable are: (i) Recipient is located outside India; (ii) Such services are provided from India and used in business outside India. (iii) Payment for such service is received by the service provider in convertible foreign exchange. The appellant has entered into an agreement with the foreign parties in terms of which they were required to give advice on opportunities related to companies incorporated, headquartered or doing business in India. However, it is not disputed that the recipient of the service is located abroad. It is also not in dispute that payment for the services were received by the appellant in convertible foreign exchange. The dispute is with reference to the question whether the services rendered by the appellant are ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Gap International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. [2014-TIOL-465- CESTAT-Del]. Vide its detailed order and after considering the various decisions of the higher Court as also various circulars issued by the Board, it stand held that services of identifying the Indian customers, for procurement of various goods on behest of foreign entity is the service provided by a foreign entity and such service provided by a person in India is consumed and used by a person abroad. It has to be treated as export of services. I also take note of the Tribunal's decision in the case of Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. v. CCE, Pune [2013-TIOL-566-CESTAT-Mum = 2013 (31) S.T.R. 738 wherein it stand held that when the services is rendered to third party at the behes....