2017 (1) TMI 1315

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent ORDER It is submission of learned counsel that the issues framed in the adjudication order in para 14 thereof are without evidence. The authority framed the issue for two products sold by the appellant to Indian Navy availing exemption under a Notification. Both goods were manufactured for Defence Department making exclusive use of an input.  Revenue disentitled the appellant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Indian Navy. When there was no use of the common input for manufacture of dutiable and exempted goods, payment of 8% value of the goods does not arise. What that is necessity of law is that there should not be admissibility of MODVAT credit due to exclusive use of the input for manufacture of exempted goods. 4.  Learned AR also says that the appellant was before Settlement Commission and wit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Therefore, application for settlement was rejected without the Commission looking into the merits of the case. This is specifically recorded in para 9 of the Commission's order. Therefore, merit in the case is open for the Tribunal to look into that afresh. 8.  When the merit is looked into, nothing is apparent from the adjudication order to appreciate that the authority made any trial run t....