Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
Upgrade to AI Search ✕

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search →

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Search : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Search ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

Measures for reducing litigation- Clarification on Circulars 21/2015 and 8/2016

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sued vide CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, to the effect that appeals/SLPs should not be filed in cases where tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits specified under para 3 of the said Circular. It was also clarified therein that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed in the said Circular. 2. In para 8 of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n noticed that para 8 (c) of Circular No. 21 / 2015, regarding cases where addition made on account of Revenue Audit Objection is deleted, is being erroneously interpreted and appeals are being mechanically filed by the Department without proper examination of the case on merits. This is contrary to the instructions contained in Circular No. 21/2015 and Circular No. 8/2016. It is, therefore, clari....

PrevPreviousNextNext