Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (1) TMI 966

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nation. The appellant M/s. Rithi Lightnin Mixers is a joint venture company with M/s Lightnin Mixers Ltd., UK each holding 50% shades in the appellant company. Appellant imported impellers, gear boxes manufactured exclusively by collaborators. They were also authorised use 'LIGTHNIN' trade mark. They imported component parts in SKD conditions for local assembly with manufactured components by them. The Order-in-Original observed as follows:- "I have carefully gone through the records of the case and various documents submitted certificate produced and random copies of invoices and Bills of entry furnished by the importer with written and oral submission. Since the Indian Company M/s Rathi Lightnin Mixers Private Limited is a joint ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e under Rule 4(3). At the time before the lower authority the appellants did not submit any documents in spite of sufficient opportunity given to them by the lower authority. Other than additions under Rule 9 on account of royalty, because of Rule 4(3), the appellants are under obligation to demonstrate to the lower authority regarding acceptance of declared value and that the same conforms to test values. The appellants have not enclosed any documents in their defence. As per the respondents, while calculating royalty, value of imported component and local bought out components are excluded from selling price of finished products. The lower authority has not examined relevant provisions of the agreement to arrive at his conclusion. The ord....