2017 (1) TMI 141

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocate -  for the appellant Shri Yogesh Agarwal, D.R.- for the respondent ORDER The present appeals have been filed by the appellant against different Orders-in-Original Nos.30/2008, dated 17.9.2008, 35/2008  dated 30.9.208 and 45-46/2009, dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Jaipur. 2.  The issue involved in the present appeals is the eligibilit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....items relies on the following decisions: (i)  CCE Vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. -2010 (255) ELT 481 (SC); (ii)  Union of India Vs. Associated Cement Company Ltd. - 2011 (267) ELT 55 (Chhattisgarh); (iii)  Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2013 (294) ELT 581 (Tri.- Del.); (iv)  CCE Vs. India Cements Ltd. - 2014 (305) ELT 558 (Mad.); (v)  Mundra Por....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to be satisfied to find out whether or not particular goods could be said to be 'capital goods'.  When we apply the 'user test' to the case in hand, we find that the structural steel items have been used for the fabrication of support structures for capital goods.  The appellants have argued that the various capital goods, such as kiln, material handling conveyor system, furnace etc. ca....