2017 (1) TMI 58
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 28th June, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. Mr. Bajpayee, learned Counsel for the Revenue urges the following question of law for our consideration : "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....khs from the advance received under the Agreement to Sale in the Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. bonds on 2nd February, 2007. The Assessing Officer as well as the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that the respondent assessee is not entitled to the benefit of Section 54EC of the Act as the amounts were invested in the bonds prior to the sale of the subject property on 5th April, 200....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... into on 21st February, 2006 in respect of the subject property and the amounts being received by the vendor (respondent assessee) under that Agreement to Sale. Thus, these amounts when received as advance under an Agreement to Sale of a capital asset are invested in specified bonds, the benefit of Section 54EC of the Act is available. In the above view, the Tribunal holds that the facts of the pr....