2010 (10) TMI 1138
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dran JUDGMENT C. N. Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard the senior standing counsel appearing for the Revenue and senior counsel Shri Sarangan appearing for the respondent-assessee. 2. The short question raised in the appeal filed by the Revenue is whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the order of the CIT(A) upholding respondent-assessee's claim of loss of Rs. 55,61,146 on acco....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....es and going by the system of accounting maintained, the entire income is assessable. In other words loss if any on account of de-escalation of prices could be accounted only in the subsequent year that is for the asst. yr. 2001-02. The claim of loss therefore was rejected and assessment completed based on the income credited in the accounts. 3. The CIT(A) following the decision of the Supreme ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hich is for subsequent sales at revised rate started only from 1st Nov., 2000. Therefore, what is required to be found out is as to when the oil companies have started effecting recovery of the excess payments made to the respondent-assessee on account of price variation effected retrospectively. We are of the view that the case of the Revenue that income has to be determined in accordance with th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....account of price variation only in subsequent years because without raising bills or debit notes they cannot account the price difference. We also notice that the first appellate authority and the Tribunal which are essentially fact-finding authorities have not considered the way the price difference is accounted by the assessee and by the purchasers. The assessee's contention that only real i....
TaxTMI