Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1962 (2) TMI 100

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... written agreement dated April 29, 1952, he paid the consideration of ₹ 1,25,000. He took delivery and possession of the buses on April 30, 1952, and began to operator them himself. In the income-tax assessment proceedings for the year 1953-54 he claimed depreciated in respect of these buses on the sum of ₹ 1,25,000 which according to him represented his original cost of acquisition of the vehicles. The Income-tax Officer, Vellore, noted the fact that the buses were all of old model, 3 of the year 1942, 3 of the year 1946, 3 of the year 1947 and one of the year 1950. He was of opinion that the sum of ₹ 1,25,000 could not represent the value of the vehicles alone, but that some part of that amount must represent the value ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Tribunal for rectification of its order under section 35 of the Indian Income-tax Act. The contention of the assessee was that the figure of ₹ 60,000 mentioned in the order of the Tribunal as presenting the route value was a mistake for ₹ 20,000. He claimed that the original cost of the vehicles for the purpose of depreciation allowance should be fixed at ₹ 1,05,000. In dealing with this application the Tribunal observed that it did not intend to increase the "route value" from ₹ 40,000 to ₹ 60,000, that it was not the object of the Tribunal to give relief to the assessee diminishing the route value from ₹ 40,000 to a lower figure, but conceded that the order partly allowing the appeal has ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld be taken as the value of the vehicles and vehicles alone, as it is not permissible under the Motor Vehicles Act to transfer permits for pecuniary consideration. We must observe that there is a fallacy in this argument. A permit is defines under section 2(xx) of the Motor Vehicles Act as a document issued by a State or Regional Transport Authority authorising the use of a transport vehicle as a contract carriage or as stage carriage. Section 59 of the Act states that a permit shall not be transferable from one person to another except with the permission of the transport authority which granted the permit and it also states that no person to whom the permit is transferred shall have any right to use the vehicle without such permission. Th....