Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 1387

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Technical) Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Supdt (AR), for Appellant Shri Pravin Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent Per: Anil Choudhary This appeal is filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 122-CE/2007 dated 22/11/07 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Lucknow. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the Commissioner (Appeals) while concluding that "the case is cove....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er they were governed by the provisions of Section 4(1)(b), specifically by Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of price of Excisable goods) Rules, 2000. 2. The Commissioner (Appeals) has also not taken into consideration the fact that exclusion of the cost of transportation under Rule 5 is not absolute but conditional and is subject to the fulfillment of the laid down require....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and sale at uniform prices inclusive off equated freight for delivery at factory gate or elsewhere, no deductions for freight element will be permissible". 4. The Commissioner (Appeals) has not appreciated the fact that wherever freight is charged on an average basis, the cost of transportation cannot be shown on an actual basis on every invoice. In such cases, even when any amount attributabl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Customs & Central Excise, Nagpur Vs Ispat Industries Ltd. 2015 (324) E.L.T. 670 (S.C.) and urges for dismissal of appeal. 7. Having considered the rival contention we find that freight have been charged separately and received separately. We also take notice that the buyers of the goods-State Electricity Board have issued purchase order specifying the price for the goods separately and also ....