Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 1229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Revenue ORDER This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant against Order-in-Appeal No.90/KOL-II/2012 dated 27.09.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise(Appeals), Kolkata-III as First Appellate Authority. 2.  Shri M.K.Guha Neogy (Consultant) appearing on behalf of the Appellant argued that certain shortages in different types of inputs and scrap were detected by the Officers....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hary, Supdt.(AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue made the Bench go through para 8a and 8c of the show cause notice to argue that job-work challan Nos.71-78 were issued by the Appellant to create paper, but in reality the goods were never sent to M/s.Rima Gases (P) Ltd. for job-work. It is the case of the ld.AR that there was a deliberate attempt to clandestinely clear inputs without reversal of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....; So far as detection of shortages of inputs and finished goods are concerned, the same were detected in a joint verification done by the Appellant and the departmental officers. The same was also admitted by the Authorized Representative of the Appellant. Subsequently taking a stand that stock verification was not done properly can only be considered as an after-thought and is rejected. Appellant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n an amount equivalent to Cenvat Credit taken is required to be reversed. The argument of the Appellant that inputs on receipt were found defective and were cleared as waste and  scrap is not tenable because even if the defective inputs are sold as scrap then also the actual Cenvat Crdit taken at the time of receipt of these inputs was required to be reversed. It is also observed from the cas....