Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 1169

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atin Mahajan, Advocate for the Appellant(s) Shri D.K. Deb, Assistant Commissioner, (AR), for the Department ORDER Heard on the stay application. The brief facts of the case are that the police raided the residential premises of this appellant, Sanjay Rathore, on 3rd August, 2011 and found two packaging machines. The police booked a case under Sections 272, 420, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC and r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... There is no seizure of any machine, raw material or finished goods by the Revenue. The whole basis is the statement of Sanjay Rathore which cannot form the basis for raising the demand more particularly when such statements have been retracted. It is further urged that clandestine removal needs to be proved on the basis of corroborative evidence which is absent. It is further urged that the appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act and reliance is also placed on the rulings in the cases of Sanjeev Kumar Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh reported at 2016 (332) E.L.T. 338 (Tri. - Delhi), Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Surat-II Versus Manikchand G. Sharma reported at 2010 (257) E.L.T. 87 (Gujarat) and also reliance on the case of Commissioner of Central Exci....