Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 1151

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../02/2007 with Customs House, Visakhapatnam for import of 160 pieces of Gurjan Round Logs of Myanmar origin. The vessel arrived on 28/02/2007 and the logs were permitted to be removed to the bonded warehouse premises of M/s. Maha Maruti Logistics Pvt. Ltd. The entire logs had been transported from the vessel to the bonded warehouse during the period between 28/02/2007 and 04/03/2007. The logs / goods were waiting the examination by the Customs Officers. Based on specific intelligence, the DRI officers visited the bonded premises and found that 34 logs were removed from the bonded warehouse. It is alleged that the appellant removed 34 logs and also attempted to tamper the goods by way of cutting some of the logs lying in the warehouse before ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ustoms duty paid and therefore no intention to evade payment of duty can be alleged against them. Further he submitted that the imposition of redemption fine of Rs. 2 lakhs on the 34 pieces of timber logs is not legal since the goods are not available for confiscation and also for the reason that the appellant has paid duty upon these 34 numbers of logs. He pleaded to take a lenient view with regard to penalty imposed on the appellant as well as Shri Aman Garg. 4. On behalf of the respondent, the learned AR Shri Arun Kumar stressed the point that the appellants had interfered with the goods kept in the bonded warehouse. The appellants had tampered with the timber logs, which is established from the fact that they had brought wood cutting m....