Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (7) TMI 1241

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AM Challenging the order,dt.11.12.13,of the CIT(A)-38 the assessee has filed the present appeal raising various grounds. However the effective ground of appeal is about confirming the disallowance of Rs. 4.40 lakhs u/s.14A of the Act r.w r. 8D of the Income tax Rules, 1962. Assessee -company, engaged in the business of data dissemination service, filed its return of income on 18.9.2010 declarin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by the order of the AO, assessee preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority(FAA). Before him, it was argued that it had made investment into various schemes of mutual funds and had earned dividend income, that the entire investment was made out of own funds,that no interest was paid for any loan to earn exempt income, that there was no investment held as on 31.03.10, that the ques....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent order, he held that disallowance for common administrative expense was necessary, that the submission of the assessee that after voluntary disallowance made by it, no addition should have been made was not a valid argument, that the Hon'ble Bombay High Court had, in the case of Godrej & Boyce(328ITR81) had held that Rule 8D was applicable for the AY 2008-09 onwards, that assessee had avail....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... rival submissions and perused the material before us. We find that the AO had made a disallowance of Rs. 7.76 lakhs, that he disallowed an amount of Rs. 4.4lakhs on account of interest payment, that the assessee had made a suo moto disallowance of Rs. 3. 36 lakhs on prorata basis, that while making the disallowance the AO had not mentioned as to why the disallowance made by the assessee, amountin....