Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 927

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ired to be paid on or before 5/11/2009. On 5/11/2009, the chief accountant of the appellant company Mr. Umapati Nandi paid the service tax on line vide GAR-7 challan No. 50602, BSR Code 6910333 dated 05/11/2009 for Rs. 1,54,540/-. After making request for payment on the bank's website, he did not receive the acknowledgement of the payment made and assuming that the first request for payment has not been registered, he immediately made the second request and paid the same amount vide challan sequence No.50740, BSR Code 6910333 for Rs. 1,54,540/-. Later on, after reconciling the transactions with the bank statement, it came to the notice of the Accountant that the payment has been made twice. The appellant filed refund claim on 29/12/2009 bef....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....een shown rendered for the month of October, 2009 instead of September, 2009, against which the double payment of service tax had been stated to have made. In this context, they exhibited a computer generated input obtained from the bank in form of 'statement criteria from 01.11.2009 to 06.11.2009', with the aid of which it had been tried to prove the fact of double payment of identical amount, but, nothing had been found mentioned to such effect, in the said statement. In this regard, a deficiency memo was issued to the said claimant and, on receipt of the reply to such memo the matter has been scrutinized further, which established the service of 'sales promotion' pertaining to the period of September, 2009, only, as against the period of....