Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 719

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Reddy, JC (AR), For the respondent ORDER None present for the appellant. 2.  Revenue says that the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has passed a very elaborate and reasoned order.  We do not disagree with the ld. DR when we see the length and breadth of the order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals).  But when we look into the grounds of appeal, appellant has raised two considerabl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....  Thereby there would not have been any intention more so wilful intention to evade duty. 3.  The ld. Adjudicating authority and the appellate authority have gone beyond the allegations contained in the show cause notice and have gone to the extent of holding that the appellant was an instrument to function as a fagade and having conspired in the commissioning of the offence.  Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anting imposition of penalty on the appellant. 7.  The ld. Commissioner has failed to appreciate the various contentions of the appellant also that of the main appellant and if only the submissions were appreciated, there would not have been any scope for confirmation of duty demand on the main appellant. 8.  The appellant further submits that the imposition of penalty is not sustain....