Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (10) TMI 660

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al for the assessment year 1990-91. The following effective grounds have been raised : "1. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in dismissing the assessee's appeal without giving him an opportunity of being heard. 2. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in order of the A.C.I.T. in treating the compensation of ₹ 5,25,000 received by the assessee on surrender of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n 24-10-2003 in IT Appeal No. 3870 (Mum.) 1996 (for the assessment year 1990-91) in the case of Asstt. CIT v. Beetee Silk Mills (P.) Ltd. copy at page 9 of the APB. As such, this issue is decided in favour of the assessee. 4. So far as regards the third ground, our attention has been drawn to page 1 of the APB, The assessee was required to substantiate the genuineness of the claim of sub-brokerag....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... not have been made. As such, this addition is deleted. Ground No.3 is, hence, accepted. 5. Apropos the last ground it has not been disputed that the amount of ₹ 51,000 was made over to the Bombay Stock Exchange as a membership fee. At Page 7 of the APB is the letter from the Stock Exchange which requires the assessee to pay the admission fee of ₹ 51,000. Admittedly, this fee has been....