Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 598

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Per: Raju                 The appellant, M/s Lemon Tree Hotels Pvt. Ltd., were earlier registered for providing various services and were availing CENVAT Credit for the same. With effect from 1.5.2011, they registered themselves for the services of Short Term Accommodation and Restaurant Services and started availing b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (a) Archivista Engineering Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III - 2015-TIOL-1278-CESTAT-MUM. (b) Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur - 2014 (34) STR 430 (Tri-Mum) (c) Hotel Amarjit Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur - 2014 (35) STR 140 (Tri-Mum). 3. Learned AR relied on the impugned order. He also relied ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Government is also to express, that it is not to disallow the Cenvat credit for the previous period as there is no such specific bar in the subsequent Notification No. 1/2006. This view, is further fortified by the view taken by C.B.E. & C. Circular with respect to brought forward Cenvat credit under Rule 6 sub-rule (3) when the disability of utilisation of 20% was removed." 4.1 In the case o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion is satisfied, abatement is permissible. Discharge of service tax liability on the non-abated portion of value is a totally different matter. Hence there is no bar/restriction in discharging service tax liability through accumulated CENVAT credit so long as no CENVAT credit is taken on the inputs/capital goods or input services used in the rendering of the service in the given case or contract ....