2016 (12) TMI 550
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order dated 06/02/2015 passed by the learned C.I.T.(A)-2, Jaipur for A.Y. 2010-11. The effective ground of the appeal is as under:- Ground in A.Y. 2010-11 "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the ld CIT(A) has erred in directing to restrict trading addition to Rs. 7,85,442/- i.e. 15% of bogus purchases as ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....Y. 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11, it came to light that the average gross profit was not calculated correctly inasmuch as the trading additions made for A.Y. 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 were not taken into consideration while adopting the average of GP rate. Therefore, the Assessing Officer gave show cause notice U/s 154 of the Act. It was contended by the assessee before him that the ap....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....purchases, which was worked out to Rs. 13,09,070/- by relying upon the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of M/s Sanjay Oilcake Industries Vs CIT (2008) 10 DTR (Guj) 153 and the order of the ld CIT(A) in the case of assessee for A.Y. 2008-09. The ld Assessing Officer has also applied average GP rate of last 5 years, which was worked out at 6.06%, on the basis of the book results. A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d. Since the trading addition on disallowance of 15% of unverifiable purchases had been sustained and trading addition on account of average GP rate of the last five years had not been sustained. Accordingly, he deleted the addition made U/s 54 of the Act. 4. Now the revenue is in appeal before us. The ld DR has vehemently supported the order of the Assessing Officer. 5. At the outset, the l....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI