Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (8) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssioner of Income Tax Judge(s)  : S. P. BHARUCHA., Y. K. SABHARWAL. and ASHOK BHAN. ORDER Civil Appeals Nos. 292-298 of 2001 : We are concerned in these appeals with the assessment years 1988-89 to 1994-95. The High Court reframed the questions that arise in these appeals thus: "(1) Whether the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing the claim of the assessee-bank for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....estion, therefore, is answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee. In so far as the third question is concerned, it is clear that the provision of safe deposit vaults is part of the ordinary banking business of a bank ; this is shown by section 6(1)(a) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Therefore, the income derived by the assessee from the hiring out of safe deposit vaults is income ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for one or other reason on which it is not necessary for us to dilate. We think that it is in the interests of justice that the assessee should have the opportunity to lead evidence before the Commissioner (Appeals) to establish as a fact what is stated above. So far as the second question is concerned, therefore, the matter is stand restored to the Commissioner (Appeals) for being decided afres....