Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1957 (12) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nment Pleader JUDGMENT This is a reference by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore, Travancore-Cochin and Coorg, Bangalore, under section 109(2) of the Cochin Income-tax Act (VI of 1117). The questions referred are: "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income-tax Officer was correct in making the assessments for the years 1120 and 1121 M.E. under the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....able." The assessment years with which we are concerned in this case are the Malayalam years 1120 (accounting period 1119 M.E.) and 1121 (accounting period 1120 M.E.) and it is common ground that if section 38 (1)(c) is not attracted and the period of eight years is unavailable, the two orders impugned (annexure B and C dated 27-7-1953/13-12-1128) are out of time and cannot be sustained. 3. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me, or deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, he may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty, in the case referred to in clause (a) in addition to the amount of the income-tax and super-tax, if any, payable by him, a sum not exceeding one and a half times that amount, and in the cases referred to in clauses (b) and (c) in addition to any tax payable by him, a sum....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s impossible to say that when a person has failed to furnish any return at all what he has done is to conceal the particulars of his income or to deliberately furnish inaccurate particulars of such income within the meaning of clause (c) of section 38(1) of the Act. We entertain no doubt that the offence in such a case should be considered as one coming under clause (a) and not under clause (c) of....