2016 (12) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellant: Sh. Bipin Garg, Advocate Present for the Respondent: Sh. G. R. Singh, AR Per: B. Ravinchandran: The appellant are aggrieved by the order dated 02.03.2009 of Commissioner (Appeals) Jaipur-II. The issue involved in the present appeal is relating to rejection of refund claim of additional duties of excise. The refund claim consisting of two components, Rs. 24,23,248/- relatable....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sistant Commissioner before the expiry of period specified in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. In the present case, the appellant exported the goods in the year 2004 and filed the refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on 27.08.2007 before the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. The refund claim was filed well beyond the period of one year from the date of shipment. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efund. The Hon'ble High Court recorded that though no specific relevant date is prescribed in the Notification, the 'relevant date' must be the date on which the final products are cleared for export. If any other conclusion is arrived, it will result in disentitling any person to make a claim for cenvat credit. Accordingly, the Hon'ble High Court held that time period of one year should be reckon....