Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1986 (3) TMI 6

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the circumstances of the case, the reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, initiated by the Income-tax Officer for the assessment years 1955-56 to 1962-63 against the assessee were valid in law ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the action under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1955-56 to 1962-63 ?" The real question, therefore, is whether there were facts from which it could be believed that there was failure or omission to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment as a result of which income has escaped assessment. The assessment was sought to be reopened for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order and the affidavit that the valuation report was discussed and the amount of depreciation was more or less agreed to between the parties. The Revenue's case, on the other hand, is that, which portion of the assets consisted of masonry work and which of earth work were not discussed or disclosed. The assessee's contention before the revenue authorities was that the primary facts were discussed fully and it was open to the Revenue to examine this aspect in greater detail and it was not possible after the lapse of such a long time to say actually whether what portion of asset consisted of earth work has been disclosed or not. It appears, however, from the order of the Tribunal that by its last letter addressed to the Income-tax Officer, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t in dispute. The only question, therefore, is, whether there was failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment and further whether such income had escaped assessment and whether such escapement or underassessment had been caused as a result of the failure or omission on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. What facts are material facts would depend upon the facts and circumstances of a particular case. This follows from the scheme of the section and is well-settled by the authorities of this court. It is the admitted Position that the assessee had not disclosed either by a valuation report or by a statement before the Income-tax Officer as t....