2016 (11) TMI 1168

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....N. Mehta, Consultant ORDER  This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against OIA No. AKP/226/DMN/NDMN/2009-2010 dated 23.12.2009 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Daman. 2.    Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Respondent had availed CENVAT credit of Rs. 11,87,072/-on the capital goods, namely, Blow Moulding Machine falli....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bsp; Hence, the Revenue is an appeal.  3.    Ld. AR for Revenue reiterating  the grounds of appeal submits that the Respondent are required to reverse the credit, availed at the time of receipt of the capital goods, on its clearance from factory  in view of Rule 3(5) of CCR 2004 and not on the transaction value of the said capital goods.  However, he fairly acce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efore, the clearance by them on the transaction value is appropriate.  He submits that even otherwise the demand issued in the year 2008 for recovery of CENVAT credit on clearance of the capital goods in 2006, is barred by limitation.  5.    Heard both sides and perused the records.  The short point needs to be addressed is:  whether on clearance of the capital ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ine the quantum of credit required to reversed in the light of Board's Circular and aforesaid judgements.   The aspect of limitation though considered by adjudicating authority but not addressed by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order.  On a query from the bench about the claim of the respondent that whether they have disclosed all the facts to the department, the ld....