2016 (11) TMI 1055
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng grounds have been raised:- "1(a) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,04,238/- on account of suppression of sale proceeds of flat which was higher than the value of determined by the Stamp Duty Valuation Authority. 1(b) On the facts and the circumstances of the case the Ld CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the consideration received on sale of flat was higher as compared to stamp duty valuation and there was no reason to disbelieve the actual consideration received and resort to other sale instance in arriving at erroneous conclusion of suppression of sales. 1(c) On the facts and circumstances of the case the condition and location of capital asset sold in question w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-term-capital-gain of Rs. 3,04,238/- in the following manner:- Total Sale consideration Rs. 73,00,000 Rs. 60 lacs shown by assessee and Rs. 13 lacs estimated as suppression Less: Expenses on transfer Rs. 72,750 Rs. 72,27,250 Less: Total cost of acquisition as given by the assessee Rs. 69,23,012 Short Term Capital Gain Rs. 3,04,238 3. The Ld. CIT(A), upheld the action of the Assessing Officer on the ground that, no convincing explanation has been filed by the assessee for selling second transaction of the flats at a lower price than the earlier transaction of the two flats. 4. Before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, drew our attention to the 'Sale Deeds' of the two flats and submitted that, Flat No.303 and 3....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....see had purchased four flats in one building from M/s Nirmal Life Styles. The date of agreement for purchase, purchase consideration, date of sale, sale consideration and value as per the Stamp valuation of the four flats are as under:- S No. Flat No./ Area Date of Purchase Purchase Price in Rs. As Per Agreement Date of Sale Sale price in Rs. as per Agreement FMV as per Stamp Duty Valuation (Rs.) 1 305 441 Sq. ft. 17.4.2005 14,90,000 24.06.2009 36,50,000 53,55,210 2 306 519 Sq. ft. 17.4.2005 17,50,000 24.06.2009 36,50,000 3 303 525 Sq. ft. 02.8.2006 29,60,784 14.07.2009 35,00,000 29,78,820 4 304 435 Sq. ft. 02.8.2006 24,51,312 14.07.2009 25,00,000 23,76,990 From the above, it can be seen that so fa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of Rs. 3,04,238/- is deleted and sale consideration shown by the assessee as per the sale agreement of the two flats, viz. flat no. 303 and 304 is to be taken as such. Accordingly, ground raised by the assessee is allowed. 7. Now, we will take-up revenue's appeal, vide which various grounds have been raised with regard , firstly, denial of benefit under section 54(1); secondly, addition of Rs. 3,04,328/- on account of Stamp duty valuation; and lastly, Rs. 5 lakhs on account of unsecured loans. 8. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel submitted that, the tax effect on the disputed issues raised in the grounds of appeal by the revenue is less than Rs. 10 lakhs. 9. Ld. DR also admitted that the tax effects on the disputed issues are below the pre....