Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (3) TMI 1068

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Hon'ble ITAT was correct in law in confirming the order of the learned CIT(A) scaling down the net profit to 8% on the gross receipts as against 12% applied by the AO at the time of assessment? 2. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT was correct in law in confirming the order of the learned CIT(A) allowing the depreciation out of the net profit?" 2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved, as narrated in the appeal may be noticed. The assessee is a contractor firm. It is engaged in the business of execution of government contracts. Return declaring income of Rs. 23,94,720/- was filed on 29.9.2009 and the same was processed under section 143(1) on 28.3.2011. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny. Duri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecorded as under:- 'The revenue challenges order dated 21.2.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar and order dated 7.6.2012, passed by the CIT(A) by raising the following substantial questions of law:- "1. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT was correct in law in confirming the order of the learned CIT(A) scaling down the net profit to 8% on the gross receipts as against 12% applied by the AO at the time of assessment? 2. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT was correct in law in confirming the order of the learned CIT(A) allowing the depreciation out of the net profit?" We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and find no reason to interfere with the order passed by the CIT(A), affirmed by the Income Tax Appellate T....