Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (7) TMI 1043

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is a Revenue appeal against the order of CIT(A)-38, Mumbai dated 1.7.2011. We have heard the ld. DR and the ld. Counsel. 2. Ground No.1 : The revenue has raised the following ground "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) erred in holding that deduction u/s.20,70,684/- on account of bad debts u/s. 3691)(viii) r.w.s. 36(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961 was allow....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urt upheld the order of the ITAT on the issue following the decision of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shreyas S. Morakhia (342 ITR 285) . Therefore, we see no reason to interfere with the order of CIT(A). Accordingly, the ground is rejected. 3. Ground No.2 is as under :- "2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the ad....