Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (11) TMI 422

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al is directed against Order-in- Appeal No. SB(41) 41/M.V./2010 dtd. 28/4/2010 passed by the Commissioner(Appeals), Central Excise, Mumbai Zone-I wherein Ld. Commissioner upheld the Order-in-Original dated 31/10/2008 and rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. The fact of the case is that the appellant have availed Cenvat credit in respect of capital goods on which they also have claimed depreci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al goods, amounting to Rs. 54206/-(Rupees Fifty Four thousand two hundred six only) under Rule 15(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. 4) I impose penalty of Rs. 459357/- (Rupees four lakhs fifty nine thousand three hundred fifty seven only) on M/s. Vishesh Enterprises under Rule 15(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of Central Ex....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... claim of the appellant that they have reversed the depreciation does not hold water for the reason that once the depreciation has been claimed, the Cenvat Credit is not admissible in terms of Rule 4(4) of CCR, 2004. 5. I have carefully considered the submission made by Ld. A.R. and perused the record. 6. I find that limited issue involved in the case is that whether the appellant is entitled fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sition of penalty, I find that not only in the show cause notice but in the Adjudication order also demand confirmed under Section 11A for an amount of Rs. 7,091/- whereas penalty under Section 11AC was imposed for an amount of Rs. 4,49,357/-. Penalty under Section 11AC can only be imposed when the duty demand is determined under Section 11A(1). In the present case the duty determined under Sectio....