Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1998 (1) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-tax Act on account of default having been committed by the appellant in payment of income-tax within time. In order to avoid this levy, the appellant filed an application under sub-section (2A) of section 220 before the Central Board of Direct Taxes, inter alia, stating facts and reasons as to why the amount of interest which was payable should be reduced, if not waived altogether. Reasons for se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al Board of Direct Taxes had given no reasons. The High Court observed, while dismissing the writ petition, that the order of the Central Board of Direct Taxes could not be said to be vitiated for this reason. When an application is filed under sub-section (2A) of section 220 the authority concerned is called upon to take a quasi-judicial decision. If it is satisfied that the reasons contained in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sions with regard to the amount of interest which an assessee is required to pay it would be imperative that some reasons are given by the authority while disposing of the application. Mr. Salve, learned senior counsel for the appellant, has strongly relied upon the observations of this court in Siemens Engineering and Manufacturing Co. of India Ltd. v. Union of India [1976] AIR 1976 SC 1785; [197....