2016 (11) TMI 282

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent ORDER The appellant, M/s Chaney & Co, is before us on the short point of imposition of penalty by the original authority to the extent that it has been upheld by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune in order-in-appeal no. P-I/RKS/258/2010 dated 9th December 2010. 2. The case against the appellant, who is registered as provider of 'erection, installation and commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....73 of Finance Act, 1994. 4. Heard the Learned Authorized Representative. 5. The determination of tax liability was a consequence of routine scrutiny of service tax returns followed by summons of the balance sheet of the appellant. From this it can be inferred that there was no attempt at subterfuge or suppression. Moreover, the promptitude with which the determined tax liability was deposite....