2016 (11) TMI 159

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vate bonded warehouse license and in-bond manufacture Sanction Order dated 5/2006 and export "flavours, essences and odiferous substances" falling under chapter heading 3302 1010 of CETA, 1985. 2.  The appellant filed refund of Rs. 10,94,507/- on 3.4.2012 for the period July 2011 to September 2011 under Notification No.5/2006 dated 14.3.2006 under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The adjudicating authority rejected the refund to the extent of Rs. 2,05,245/- and allowed refund of Rs. 8,89,262/-. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (A). The Commissioner (A) allowed refund of Rs. 86,490/- in respect of services of CHA, C & F and telephone services and rejected the refund of Rs. 1,18,755/- on the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed refund of these two services under the category of BAS when they made separate claims under the said services. Learned counsel further submitted that by mistake few invoices of CHA and insurance services were included under BAS and refund was claimed but there is no double claim of the same amount which is clear from the perusal of CENVAT credit register, a copy of which is enclosed. He further submitted that visa processing charges were incurred to make visa for Directors to visit the clients at abroad to market the products of the appellants and this is specifically included in the input service definition. He also submitted that findings in the impugned order that the appellant had claimed excess credit in refund application when comp....