2016 (11) TMI 112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent: Mr. A.P. Srinivas Senior Panel Counsel ORDER Heard Mr. R. Barathkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.P. Srinivas, learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2.The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the Or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the service tax liability on account of certain defaults committed by his tenant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to clear the entire service tax and produced a demand draft for a sum of Rs. 6,30,854/- in Cheque No.001107 560240065 before this Court towards service tax liability alone. It is seen that the said demand draft had expired and the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a sum of Rs. 6,30,854/- towards the Service Tax, as quantified in paragraph No.21(i) of the impugned order and Rs. 6,60,292.90, towards interest claimed in paragraph No. 21(ii) of the impugned order. 4.The learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents who has got instructions from the Department, submitted that the petitioner has effected payment and has complied with the interim ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d not complied with, the petitioner had filed an Execution Petition in E.P.No.5 of 2014, to execute the said order and the said petition is also pending. Further, the petitioner has filed a Civil Suit in O.S.No.2928 of 2015, on the file of the City Civil Court, Bangalore, for recovery of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 89,85,529/- and the same is also pending. 6.Thus, considering the situation....