2016 (11) TMI 112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or Panel Counsel ORDER Heard Mr. R. Barathkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.P. Srinivas, learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2.The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the Order- In Original dated 10.03,2014, under th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mmitted by his tenant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to clear the entire service tax and produced a demand draft for a sum of Rs. 6,30,854/- in Cheque No.001107 560240065 before this Court towards service tax liability alone. It is seen that the said demand draft had expired and the petitioner is ready to re-validate the same. In my view, the said ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h No.21(i) of the impugned order and Rs. 6,60,292.90, towards interest claimed in paragraph No. 21(ii) of the impugned order. 4.The learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents who has got instructions from the Department, submitted that the petitioner has effected payment and has complied with the interim directions issued by this Court. 5.Admittedly, the petitioner did not avail ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of 2014, to execute the said order and the said petition is also pending. Further, the petitioner has filed a Civil Suit in O.S.No.2928 of 2015, on the file of the City Civil Court, Bangalore, for recovery of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 89,85,529/- and the same is also pending. 6.Thus, considering the situation which the petitioner has been pushed to and taking note of the fact that the pet....