Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

Delhi High Court Invalidates Rule 3 (2) (b) (ii) of Luxury Tax Rules 1996, Exceeds Legal Authority on VAT.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Vires of Rule 3 (2) (b) (ii) of the Delhi Tax on Luxury Rules, 1996 - bifurcation of consolidated bill amount - as long as there is a sale or transfer of goods or right to use the goods or other services which are purportedly a subject of VAT, that the dealer is subjected to actual levy and collection at a higher threshold is a matter of detail. - Rule 3 (2) (b) (ii) is ultra vires - HC....