Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (11) TMI 11

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....October, 2004. After detailed follow-up investigation, proceedings were initiated against the respondent for violation of the provisions of Export Import Policy, 2002-2007 read with Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rule 1993, Customs Act, 1962 and Central Excise Act, 1944. The allegation is that the respondent imported duty free cloves for use in the manufacture of spices, however, they have diverted 130.2 MT of the said duty free imported items and not utilized it for the intended purposes. The customs duty of Rs. 1,01,37,500/- is sought to be demanded on these grounds. Further, central excise duty of Rs. 19,42,899/- short paid by the respondent on advance DTA sales is also sought to be recovered. The case was adjudicated and the original author....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....quantity of final products as claimed by them. The revenue also contended that there is no finding by the Original Authority regarding penalty on Shri Deepak Kumar Agarwal. 4. We have heard both the sides and perused the appeal records. 5. The first point is regarding alleged diversion of 130.31 M.T. of imported cloves. We find that on the date of verification of the respondent, they had a stock of 83,640 kgs of Hot Mix Masala. However, the Revenue contends that the respondent do not possess the required facility to make the final product as approved by the Development Commissioner. We find that the presence of huge quantity of final product on the date of visit of the officers has not been examined and explained by the Revenue. Further....