2016 (10) TMI 671

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xcise<br>Sangeet Lodha And Kailash Chandra Sharma, JJ. Mr. Kamal Dave, for the appellant Mr. Vijay Vyas, for the respondents ORDER BY THE COURT ( PER HON&#39;BLE MR. SANGEET LODHA, J.) 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 14.10.13 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (&#39;the Appellate Tribunal&#39;) whereby an appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder was upheld by the CCE(A), vide order dated 12/14.12.12. 3. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, accompanied by an application seeking stay on the demand. The stay petition preferred by the appellant was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal for non-prosecution and the appellant was directed to discharge the assessed liability pursuant to the adj....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dated 9.9.13, without considering the application preferred by the assessee for recalling/modification of the said order, rejecting the stay petition preferred for non-prosecution ? 6. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is finally heard at this stage. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the Appellate Tribunal has seriously erred in rejec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....application preferred by the appellant, seeking stay on recovery of the demand was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal for non prosecution and the appellant was directed to pre-deposit the assessed liability pursuant to adjudication order dated 30.12.10 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II, affirmed by the CCE (A), Jaipur-II. But then, the fact remains that the appell....